While going green can not too much harm. Some say its global cooling and other say its global warming and the hearty debate still lingers on in limbo. However, the thought of cost effective energy during these economic times is not too far fetch. You can save money using energy saving light bulbs and recycling. What is troubling for many is that never before had anyone had the tackle the trouble we are now facing including inflation in an uncertain market. Perhaps he is too friendly with the enemy who find him an easy prey. Many have seen Obama as just being too young and unable to tackle the subject on had. The dark side of going green may be that some products will cost more. Not to mention the price the higher price that comes with the word conservation during this recession. Water in my area alone has more than tripled to that of European bottle mineral water and we are talking about poorly treated sewage! Who knows where else this administration will try to cut corners in the name of green conservation.
Leaving us more in a bigger debt with China can hardly be even better. For the most part, many of the products from China have a one time use since they break of so easy. Most people do not have a problem with the Chinese people themselves but its for the most part the government that interferes with the people they deem a threat. The problems we are facing for the most part are clearly best left handle by a seasoned professional and only time will tell if we made the right choice. However it is too soon to figure out if Obama is just on the cutting to edge or just too green to know any better.
Your basic premise is not entirely accurate. Green is actually not very cost effective. It is less efficient, costs more to operate in most cases, and tends to compete with living spaces and the food supply... Let's face it! If it were cost effective and efficient, and private sector would be all over it! The first rule of business is to make money, after all.
ReplyDelete